Readify

Andy Warhol wig incident

The Andy Warhol Diaries

The Andy Warhol wig incident was an assault during a book signing at Rizzoli Bookstore in SoHo in October 1985. A woman pulled Warhol’s wig from his head and threw it over a balcony to a male accomplice, who ran from the store with it. Warhol declined to press charges and, after briefly covering his head with the hood of his coat, continued signing for the waiting customers. The episode’s significance lies not only in the sudden violation but in the diary’s account of what followed: a performer’s public composure becoming, almost at once, a way to endure the shock.

A Delayed Account

Warhol did not recount the incident immediately. The diary notes that he postponed talking about it for days, then finally returned to it on November 2. He introduced the account as a nightmare that had come true and said he needed to get through it quickly because he could not face it. That delay gives the entry an unusual shape: it is not a record made in the immediate aftermath, but a return to an experience he had been trying to avoid. Even when he finally tells it, he repeatedly signals his wish to move past it.

The day had already begun badly. Benjamin did not pick Warhol up, and Warhol missed the Matsuda fashion show. He later recalled feeling worn out and angry with Craig Nelson. These circumstances do not explain the assault, but they are part of how Warhol described his vulnerability in that moment: he was tired, seated in a setup that left people above him, and unprepared for anything to happen in a place where everyone seemed friendly. The signing had lasted about an hour when the attack began.

The Assault at Rizzoli

No one from Warhol’s office had agreed to accompany him to the bookstore. Bernard, an old assistant to Rupert Smith who happened to be visiting, volunteered to go with him, and Rupert Smith dropped them off. The store was long, and the signing took place on a balcony on the second floor. The physical arrangement mattered to Warhol’s recollection: he contrasted this seated position, with people above him, with his usual practice of standing at such events. He felt the setup was wrong and that he was not quick enough to react when the assault happened suddenly.

A woman in the line handed Warhol a copy of America to sign, then pulled off his wig and threw it over the balcony. A man caught it and ran out of the store. Bernard held the woman while staff called the police. Warhol later recalled that she was held in a corner for a time and then released. He did not press charges. Although he wondered why he had not pushed her over the balcony, he also described her as pretty and well-dressed, returning to that description as he tried to make sense of an act he found shocking and difficult to absorb.

Choosing to Continue

The store staff asked Warhol whether he wanted to stop the signing. There were still customers waiting with books, and he decided to finish. Wearing a Calvin Klein coat with a hood, he pulled the hood over his head and carried on. He signed for about another hour and a half, trying to act as though the incident meant nothing. The decision did not mean that he was unhurt: he said the experience hurt physically and emotionally, and compared its unreality to being shot again. His account describes a split between what he felt and what he did in public, where he understood himself as an entertainer continuing to please an audience.

The crowd’s cameras sharpened that division. Warhol knew that pictures might be published and wondered whether one might appear on the cover of Details, but he did not know whether that would happen. He also reasoned that striking the woman could have made him the one facing lawsuits. His hesitation thus involved both the immediate shock and the possible consequences of reacting violently in front of witnesses. He described the atmosphere as becoming violent again, like the sixties, while also stressing how quickly this particular incident had unfolded. Bernard’s intervention was a counterpoint to that helplessness: Warhol remembered him as kind, and gave him ten dollars after Bernard drove him home.

Aftermath and Public Exposure

Warhol’s account connects the attack to a newly acquired healing crystal that was supposed to protect him. The crystal had not prevented what happened, and he described himself as too shaken to take comfort from it. He said the experience felt like a movie, then returned to the effort of pretending it did not matter. His words do not resolve the contradiction between performance and distress; the continued signing is at once a practical decision and the outward form of a composure he said he had to adopt.

At home, Warhol ate English muffins with margarine and garlic, drank tea and carrot juice, and tried Campbell’s dry soup. A caller rang to ask when he would leave for Washington the next morning. He ended the call quickly without mentioning the attack because he could not face discussing it. The caller rang back about an hour later, having apparently learned what happened, and told him she was proud of him and considered him a great man. Warhol treated the praise as strikingly unfamiliar, then concluded that he never needed to talk about the incident again. The conclusion sits beside the diary’s own delayed telling: he wants the story closed, but the account records how difficult it was to reach that closure.

The next day, on his way to Detroit, Warhol read Liz Smith’s item about the incident in the Daily News and was relieved that it treated him kindly. In the same paper he read about a hot-dog vendor who had been attacked by a group of children, robbed, and left with an overturned cart and serious burns, but returned to his corner the following day because he had to earn a living. Warhol recorded the two stories together without claiming they were equivalent. Their proximity places his own return to the signing beside another person’s return to work after an attack, while keeping the difference between the events intact. In both the public account and the private diary, continuing becomes part of what is remembered—but it does not erase what happened.